Comments on: Picture of the Day: “CNG Vehicles Are Even More Energy Efficient When They’re Being Towed!”

By: John

John — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:48:56 +0000

Have to agree with Leonard, even if we could get the semi’s and public transportation system to use it, it would save oil, keep money in here and create new jobs to build infrastructure and to build new vehicles. All here in the states and you wouldn’t have to pay to switch your car over Sherry. Companies would save a of money, $3.00/gal of diesel compared to $1.30 for the equivalent in CNG. There is more than enough to run quit a few power plants and a few million vehicles for over 100 years. We still need to use Solar, wind, hydro and nuclear, but this way while we get where we need to be the money stays in American pockets.

By: leonard

leonard — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:16:39 +0000

No. I’m a staunch conservative and a strong believer in the Pickens Plan. Natural gas is not pie-in-the-sky alternative energy. It’s here, it’s abundant and the profits and jobs stay in America.

By: Butchey Weinstein

Butchey Weinstein — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:21:17 +0000

Hey, leonard, are you one of those liberals who seeks to use the power of government to force every to comply with your concepts of right and wrong? Just asking.

By: sherry

sherry — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:31:29 +0000

Leonard, when you say “supporting the use of clean, efficient natural gas” does this mean the taxpayers or individual “supporters” should pay for the towing?
By the way, how much didi it cost when you converted your personal vehicle to CNG?

By: leonard

leonard — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:13:33 +0000

I fail to see the political relevance of this. Is this a pot shot at CNG fueled vehicles? Oklahomans should be supporting the use of clean, efficient natural gas.

By: red stater

red stater — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:58:23 +0000

lol